A few years ago, as the story has been passed down to believers, a great prophet named GibsonÂ proved that religion was not poison at the box office.Â Gibson begat Stein who walked in the sandals of Moore into the desert determined to prove that Gibson’s Law would apply to Documentaries.Â Half-baked metaphors aside, clearly the King of all (movie) Kings is Mel Gibson’s “The Passion Of The Christ.”Â While this enormously successful film was as much a cultural and theological phenomena as a cinematic one, there’s no question it struck a responsive chord with millions of Christians worldwide.Â Now, four years later, there is another movie that has deep religious undertones and a swirl of controversy surrounding it — Ben Stein’s “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed.”Â Can prophet Stein match prophet Gibson when it comes to turning the Meek loose on the Earth?Â Will “Intelligence” trump “Passion?”
[singlepic id=663 w=320 h=240 float=right]
This movie follows Ben Stein as he seeks to determine whether religious-based Intelligent Design is a pseudo-science trying to undermine evolutionary biology or whether it is legitimate science being suppressed by a scientific establishment that is hostile to any deviation from the status quo.Â Good question, but as they say in Hollywood, it’s all about the execution.Â Stein is a former White House speechwriter under the Nixon Administration, probably better known for his droll wit on “Win Ben Stein’s Money.”Â First-time director, Nathan Frankowski, works with two neophyte screenwriters with only one previous credit between them, Kevin Miller and Walt Rulof, and, of course, Stein as the religious right Michael Moore.Â Maybe the film should have been called, “No Experience Allowed.”Â Anyway, there are a few head-scratchers in this film, probably topped out by the time Stein and his camera crew visit Hitler’s concentration camps and ill-advisedly correlate Darwinism to Fascism and Nazi Germany.Â As long as I’m giving advice on film marketing, maybe they could try “Stein Kampf” for the DVD release.Â Give him credit, he certainly doesn’t pull any punches when it comes to being vitriolic — even the most stalwart Bible-belt Baptist may find this analogy harder to swallow than Jonah.
[singlepic id=162 w=320 h=240 float=right]
The Defending Champion
Remember the old Spaghetti Westerns of the 1960s?Â Mel Gibson certainly does, based on this religious opus which could have been titled “A Fistful of Floggings.”Â (Note to Distributors: My re-titling services are available at a reasonable fee.)Â As the lead, James Caviezel certainly has the right physical look and the emotional intensity to take on a seemingly never-ending series of horrific flailings and beatings.Â This is a hard film to watch, seeing anybody (but especially Jesus) endure this kind of on-screen cruelty.Â Still, there is no dispute that it made “The Passion Of The Christ” a powerful movie-going experience for millions and millions worldwide.Â This, despite a screenplay by Benedict Fitzgerald and Mel Gibson himself that arguably has no plot, no plot points and no character arcs.Â As a result, there’s not all that much you can hang your shroud on.Â Still, there’s no denying that “Passion” succeeded despite a bevy of filmmaking flaws — sometimes such details as cheesy sets, a cartoon-like moon in the opening scene (think a Basil Rathbone film) and Jesus sporting a silver filling on his right molar simply don’t matter.Â Talk about a “miracle.”
When it comes to commercial success and box office results, the scorecard is not yet determined, although betting on Mr. Ed to win the Kentucky Derby would have better odds than to believe “Expelled” will come anywhere close to approaching the numbers run up by “Passion.”Â Both films, at least in this reviewer’s opinion, are flawed due to a wide variety of production issues that, quite frankly, are more than appalling.
Having said this, Herr Stein has certainly been beyond bold in presenting his case on behalf of Intelligent Design.Â In addition, his film has a far more complex subject matter so he deserves extra consideration.
The climax of “Expelled,” for example, features Stein going head-to-head with Richard Dawkins, a renowned atheist and author. It really doesn’t matter which side you’re on, both of these guys are undeniably intelligent, and it raises issues.Â By the way, this film doesn’t spend that much time focused on the details of the debate between evolutionists and creationists.Â Instead it really focuses on its key thesis that the debate itself and its proponents have been ignored or pushed out of classrooms and academia.Â In a country that still believes in the First Amendment, this is at least something worth thinking about, even if you think the other side has their head in an anatomically incorrect place.
“The Passion Of The Christ” had as much “passion” as the average Ron Jeremy flick.Â Never once did I get the feeling that Caviezel’s Jesus was someone special or divinely spiritual — his flashback scenes with his disciples and followers yielded nothing beyond a perfunctory delivery of the screenplay’s rudimentary dialogue.Â Heck, I’ve been to Tupperware parties where the speaker held my interest better.Â On the other hand, “Expelled” feels like such a total mess that it’s clear that the arguments for Intelligent Design are way beyond the capability of being articulated by Ben Stein and his gang of religious bullies.Â Maybe Alan Shore could do the trick.Â Until then, the only “intgelligent design” I know of comes from Ron Popeil and his creations at Ronco.Â The winner, by a landslide, is Melodrama Mel and “The Passion Of The Christ.”