News Ticker

The Simpsons Movie (2007) -vs- South Park: Bigger Longer & Uncut (1999)

The Simpsons Movie -vs- South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut

Lak RanaThe Smackdown

They are the champions of modern animation — The Simpsons — and after nearly two decades on-the-air they are nearing their 500th episode. But this week belongs to the challenger — South Park — which airs its own 200th episode on Wednesday night, April 14. Both TV animation sensations have spawned exactly one feature film. Even though it came to TV on the heels of the success of “The Simpsons,” it was “South Park” that broke free from the small-screen to try its luck in the cineplexes first. Both film versions tested whether audiences would pay good money to see something they were used to getting for free. History now tells us that the box office winner was “The Simpsons Movie” with $527-million worldwide box office compared to “South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut” which brought in only $83-million worldwide.

In an industry dominated by flashy special effects and high-tech computer-generated animation, both series have spared us the frills and kept their animation styles ever so simple — opting instead to deliver satirical storylines laden with witty pop-culture references. We’ll let the series fight it out amongst themselves for TV honors — for now we simply ask the question, which series made a stronger transition from television to big screen? You’ll find out in a few minutes…so… just don’t have a cow, Man!

[singlepic id=303 w=320 h=240 float=right]

The Challenger

The town of Springfield is in a state of environmental chaos after somebody illegally dumped toxic pig droppings into Lake Springfield. EPA Chief Russ Cargill cunningly convinces president Arnold Schwarzenegger to quarantine the town in a giant glass dome to contain the problem. When the town residents discover that their beloved Homer J. Simpson is the one to blame for all their troubles, they form a mob and force the Simpson family to flee from the bubble and become fugitives. While the Simpsons are trying to start a new life in Alaska they discover that the EPA and the president have one last plan of action for the Springfield situation–eradicate the town by blowing it up! Marge, Bart, Lisa, and Maggie decide to abandon Alaska immediately and return to save Springfield. However, stubborn Homer is still preoccupied with his selfish rituals and refuses to leave the comforts of Alaska. When he later realizes that he is nothing without his family and friends he charges back to Springfield and saves the town from its calamitious fate. The one draw back is that there sadly isn’t enough time in this fast paced movie to explore the many characters and places that audiences have come to admire from the television series.

[singlepic id=102 w=320 h=240 float=right]

The Defending Champion

“South Park: Bigger Longer & Uncut” takes us to the tiny little suburb of South Park where a group of parents are in an uproar because “the boys” sneaked into an R-rated movie (starring their favorite Canadian comics Terrance and Phillip) and emerged with potty mouths that quickly infect all the other kids in town. The parents launch a wild protest against the morally corrupt movie and eventually the United States is forced to declare war on Canada. The plot gets even sillier as we intercut to lovers Saddam Hussein and Satan in the underworld as they scheme to take over the planet. “Park” takes full advantage of its R-rating by bombarding the audience with the rich, over-the-top, no holds barred raunchiness that we’d naturally expect from gifted writers Trey Parker and Matt Stone.

The Scorecard

It’s no secret that as they near their 500th episode since the famed family first hit the airwaves that the the writing for “The Simpsons” television show has gone a little stale. Maybe that’s why the plot of “The Simpsons Movie” came across as somewhat unoriginal: Homer does something really terrible, sees the error of his ways, and saves the day in the end. That’s not even “Must-See” TV, let alone shell-out-the-cash cineplex time.

The movie did have a strong opening sequence and first act, however the writers appeared to run out of ideas during the lazy second act and they definitely just threw some things together in the haphazard third act in a weak attempt to give the audience some semblance of closure. Though “The Simpsons Movie” was well written overall, it still did not manage to capture the color and energy of the early television series. This is not to say that the film was not entertaining because it did dish out bountiful servings of the sophisticated social and political humor that has made the television series a household name.

Not to be outdone, “South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut” weighed in with it’s own original satirical social and political humor which, because of its R-rating, it had the liberty to take further than “The Simpsons Movie.” “South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut” attacked everybody and everything and did so using an unbelievable barrage of profane words and musical numbers. The storyline was completely ridiculous and severely keen at the same time. Writers Parker and Stone skillfully satirized an issue that is undoubtedly near and dear to their own hearts–censorship. However, the film was not without problems as the story did get a tad bit bogged down by the more than twelve musical sequences.

And the winner is…

The Decision

Though Parker and Stone usually successfully exploit inappropriate language to make their points, I felt that they overshot in “South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut.” The musical sequences sometimes did nothing to advance the story and often just served as filler. I can appreciate toilet humor as much as the next guy, but there has to be method to the madness. I’m not necessarily saying that Parker and Stone used too much obscene language…they just failed to justify why they were using it in many instances. “Park” felt less like a big feature and more like an exaggerated and drawn out television episode. The movie was clearly bigger and longer, but the musical numbers seriously needed to be cut.

“The Simpsons Movie,” on the other hand, has never relied on filthy language and cheap jokes which is why it appeals to a much wider audience. Though the story in this case was not spectacular, the film was definitely entertaining from beginning to end. “Simpsons” stays true to the form that has made it a cultural phenomenon for the the past two decades–quick, clean, and sharp wit–and unlike “Park,” does not try too hard just because it’s on the big screen. “The Simpsons Movie” wins hands down. Which is not to say that we won’t still look forward to that 200th episode of “South Park.”

9 Comments on The Simpsons Movie (2007) -vs- South Park: Bigger Longer & Uncut (1999)

  1. the truth of the matter is…the Simpsons has been around for a longer time so people like it better,however south park came after it and is at its 20th season while the Simpsons is on its 28th season and is already confirmed for a 30th season.even though both shows have been around long,the Simpsons has been around longer by 8 seasons,so that makes it more beloved by fans…Soooo,when the south park movie came out the south park fans were going crazy while the fans of the Simpsons didn’t seem impressed because they just wanted to see a Simpsons movie come out.then…the Simpsons movie came out in 2007 and fans were so happy that finally the Simpsons (AKA:the longest running cartoon ever) and people wanted to watch it. So the Simpsons movie had more recognition from the obviously the Simpsons got more money for the movie than south park.but…i think the south park movie was by far better simply because i loved the songs and the fact that they had so many. and the plot was far better easily a win for south park.and south park was better written,because in the Simpsons movie was played out as any other normal Simpsons episode but just longer.while the south park movie actually put a change to things (for example they never use to have a musical that often)and it was just different and unique.and really got me emotional when Kenny took his coat off and went to hell (literally) just to help his friends while the Simpsons movie was played out as any normal episode of the Simpsons and had no thought in it.but going back to what i said at the start about the Simpsons being more recognisable and thats why people think the Simpsons movie is better.because people are just like that just because the series of the Simpsons is better,so they automatically just think the movie is so good because the series is so good.while south park is not as good as the Simpsons (in seasons and more viewings)so people don’t see it as i think all you Simpsons fans should just admit the south park movie is better,because i don’t have a problem with people who like the Simpsons don’t get me wrong i like it too.but i have a problem with people who lie about the movie to promote/addvertize the series so it stays on air longer.and its the same problem with modern Simpsons,just because people like the old Simpsons they still watch and support the new Simpsons episodes and thats why it still on air and still doing so good .infact i even like the south park series better simply because its funny.UNLIKE THAT WHOLE “SPIDER PIG SPIDER PIG,HE DOES WHAT EVER A SPIDER PIG DOES” nonsense that homer say in the movie that isn’t even that funny but everyone says it is hilarious which i don’t even understand.and its not just the Simpsons its modern spongebob too.pretty much,i just think the south park movie is better,if you disagree thats fine but i think a bind man can see that the simpsons movie didn’t have any life in it.and thats what i think,and you should too.

  2. south park down right dumb

    • Screw You!! Southpark beats the simpsons every time you A-hole!!!

  3. simpsons smoke south park south park would lose by a landslide

  4. I think the both television shows are great, I do love the Simpsons more, however the SouthPark movie blew the Simpsons Movie out of the water It was actually a perfect film. And the musical numbers were Broadway worthy!

  5. Disagree massively.
    South Park the Movie is miles better
    Stronger, plot and the difference between a TV episode to film was greater than simpsons.
    the simpsons movie was pointless and made us feel nothing. South Park took us on an epic moving journey; we say kenny unhooded, a mass war broke out, beautiful original music, innovative plot.
    But as always simpsons wins because its simpsons… fucking ridiculous

  6. Simpsons hands down. My first experience with South Park was the feature film, and I found it absolutely abhorrent. I don’t think I “got” the humor of Parker and Stone at all…. perhaps I am not that way inclined…. anyway, Homer’s Spider Pig moment remains the funniest Simpsons moment ever.

  7. I didn’t see this Smackdown! when it was first posted so I am glad that it was brought back for the 10th anniversary of the South Park film. It is a good comparison and you make solid points for/against both films. I would have selected South Park the winner — I thought the musical numbers were terrific — but what is important is that we live in a great country where both of these TV shows and movies can be shown without undue censorship. The tradition of H.L. Mencken, Lenny Bruce and George Carlin lives on…

  8. sadly i must disagree with this review.
    The South Park movie was brilliant and lampooned big Disney songs – the opening song for example, “Mountain Town”, is a very smart riff on Beauty and the Beast’s opening “Belle”.
    South Park had satire, self awareness, and a sharper plot than the Simpsons movie. I love both franchises but I have to give the heads up challenge to the South Park movie.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.