Â The Smackdown
Summer is here with new versions of familiar entertainments: A new Batman, a new Hell Boy, and now another spy spoof.
Every spy sendup owes something in spirit to Maxwell Smart. As the main character on TV’s “Get Smart”, Agent 86 set the gold standard for goofy storylines, ridiculous gadgets and non-stop laughs. 138 episodes enshrined the standing of creators Mel Brooks and Buck Henry. This success inspired aÂ second television series and a pair of Maxwell Smart movies. Audiences forever link Don Adams with the character he played. People may not know where they first heard phrases like “Would you believe,” and “Missed it by THAT much.” In recent years major studios churned out variations like burgers at a
drive-thru: “Austin Powers,” “Charlie’s Angels,” “The Pink Panther” and
“Undercover Brother,” among others. A solid, lower key effort came in 2003: “Johnny English” with Rowan Atkinson. It failed to find a mass audience, but its human scale recalls the material that inspired it.
Now, a new “Get Smart” hits the screen with Steve Carell playing a different Maxwell Smart. In fact, this material is very different from the originalÂ –Â and that’s our Smackdown!: Does “Get Smart” climb atop the short pile of spy sendups… or get pushed back by “Johnny English?”
[singlepic id=671 w=320 h=240 float=right]
Forty years after our first exposure to “Get Smart,” Max is now an intelligence analyst in Washington, DC with CONTROL but dying to be an agent. His chance comes after an attack on CONTROL headquarters compromises a number of agents. Max goes on the trail of renegade nuclear weapons, but this bumbler’s not going alone. He’s been assigned to work with Agent 99 (Anne Hathaway) and their chemistry is strained; she has field experience, he has insecurity and attitude. Those traits are on full display as their hunt for Siegfried (Terence Stamp) and the evil guys from KAOS moves the action to Chechnya, Russia and Los Angeles. More than once Max and 99 escape death by a whisker (a standoff with a large thug becomes a group hug) and they draw closer with each misadventure. Along the way we see the requisite gadgets that fizzle (the Cone of Silence, a miniature crossbow in a pocket knife) and quirky coworkers (Alan Arkin, Dwayne Johnson, Bill Murray). In a sputtering mix of comedy and action Max and Agent 99 wind up in L.A. where nuclear annihilation / a happy ending hang in the balance. You can guess how writers Tom Astle and Matt Ember resolve matters.
[singlepic id=149 w=320 h=240 float=right]
The Defending Champ
Writers Neal Purvis, Robert Wade and William Davies ramp up a smaller crisis in “Johnny English.” Their hero is smug and clueless like TV’s Maxwell Smart, and clearly out of his depths when trouble strikes. Johnny English (Rowan Atkinson) is elevated to secret agent from paper shuffler when his screwup eliminates the cream of Britain’s MI5 agents. A disgruntled French tycoonÂ –Â Pascal SauvageÂ –Â steals England’s crown jewels in a plot to leverage an ancient but rejected family claim to the British throne. The chase takes English to France and back to England. More than once Johnny is snatched from oblivion by his assistant, Bough, and by fellow spy Lorna Campbell (Natalie Imbruglia). Will Johnny ever learn to handle his gadgets? Things don’t look good as Sauvage (John Malkovich) blackmails his way to the British throne (any wonder why this movie didn’t catch fire here?). Will Sauvage be crowned king? Will a poodle replace the English bulldog? Vous devez regarder le film!
Johnny and Max areÂ similar characters: Both are defensive, prone to stumbling and maybeÂ not as bright as they think. Smart, capable women save them more thanÂ once. Beyond that the stories quickly diverge.
“Johnny English” is a carefully produced film thatÂ did not waste its $35 million production budget. Every scene is wellÂ rehearsed, well lit and well edited. The film is not reliant on digitalÂ effects so the action scenes seem smaller, more human scale. It helpsÂ that Rowan Atkinson,Â Imbruglia and Ben Miller (Bough) effectively carry the action. JohnÂ Malkovich manages to overcome a cheesy french accent. Atkinson is aÂ physical comedian with the kind of rubbery face you just want to slapÂ half the time. He is credibly smug and inept and works especially wellÂ with Miller. Atkinson is quite popular in England, but may not beÂ strong enough to enchant audiences here. More likely, the humor isn’tÂ strong enough. There are only so many laughs anyone can wring fromÂ Johnny prancing in a mirror or having his gun malfunction. If anything,Â the humor is infrequent and overly well-behaved.
By contrast, “Get Smart” has more to work with. It isÂ well-produced but can’t decide whether it is a comedy or action movie.Â The result has an arbitrary, paint-by-numbers feel. Some of this may beÂ the different spin Steve Carell and Anne Hathaway apply to theirÂ characters. He creates a different Maxwell Smart: More self-aware thanÂ Don Adams and increasingly attracted to Agent 99. This version nicelyÂ meshes with a tougher, more aggressive Agent 99 Anne Hathaway servesÂ up. The film had more to spend on talent and it shows: Alan Arkin’sÂ comic timing is a thing of beauty as Max’s boss; Dwayne Johnson (asÂ turncoat agent 23) takes another positive step forward in a blossomingÂ career.
“Get Smart” has a problem: Not enough laughs. TheÂ movie credits Mel Brooks and Buck Henry as special consultants. MaybeÂ they should have written it. The source material from TV is well-known,Â well-regardedÂ and 60 writers contributed to the series. Why not hire a few of them for this project? The producers had an $80 million production budget.Â So… would you believe there’s a definite winner amid all these contradictions?Â You bet.
“Johnny English” is underappreciated, enjoyable and holds up well, provided you like Rowan Atkinson. It’s also well-made, but more amusing than funny. A spoof needs to be more than occasionally clever.
That’s a lesson “Get Smart” should remember. This film needed script doctors to clear out the dead spots. This movie overly relied on high production value action, which is no substitute for laughs in a comedy.
Still, the comedy that did reach the screen showed enough to win on style points: “Get Smart.”
your summary is completely confusing. i have read it three times and am still none the wiser as to which film won.
I disagree with the author… Get Smart was way more funnier than Johnny English.. I am a huge fan of Rowan Atkinson but i was so much bored when watching this movie that i felt like stopping the movie halfway.. Maybe i had expected a lot from the movie but still, I would definitely vote for Get Smart..
I had my doubts about remaking such a definitive classic show. The characters in the TV show filled up so much of the story that they needed little more than a shoe to render you helpless. This new movie seems doomed to disappoint, although the box office figures will argue otherwise. I’ll rent it.