Evan Almighty (2007) -vs- Bruce Almighty (2003)

Going One-on-One with God

The Smackdown. People like to talk about having a "personal" relationship with God. Maybe that's why both these films bring in audiences -- the chance to watch the main characters actually have that relationship on screen in a literal sense. In the wish-fulfillment saga of "Bruce Almighty," weatherman Bruce goes into an on-air meltdown followed by a rant to God about how he's doing a miserable job. Now, in the sequel "Evan Almighty," Evan prays to the Man Upstairs for good luck on his first day as a congressman -- and does it as if it's just another quick cell-phone call. Both Bruce and Evan end up in a one-on-one with God, but it's an open question as to whether this Divine Intervention was enough to float either film. You've probably heard already that "Evan Almighty" had the highest budget for a comedy in film history. Money well-spent? We'll see...

The Challenger. "Evan Almighty" is the newest movie from the creative team of director Tom Shadyac and writer Steve Oedekerk, who collaborated together on "Bruce Almighty." Evan Baxter, as played by Steve Carell, a Buffalo news anchor (he was in the original) turned Congressman, moves his family to Washington, D.C. for his new career in politics. Evan got elected through his campaign promise of 'Change the World,' which seems like one tall order for Evan to fill. Even though Evan doesn't even have a new iPhone, God still answers his call. Connection made, though, God personally assigns him the biblical duty of building an Ark due to an imminent flood. Naturally, Evan would rather tend to the people's business as he defines it rather than Ark building but Morgan Freeman's God is an unusually persuasive constituent. You try saying "no" to the guy.

The Defending Champion. "Bruce Almighty" sets up the themes, ideas, and conflicts for its spin-off, "Evan Almighty," through its character development. For instance, God, as played by Morgan Freeman, is a man in a white-suite with incredible patience for Jim Carrey's self-obsessed Bruce Nolan weatherman. Nolan challenges God to changing responsibilities with him due to his failing career that has added significant stress to his life. God, being a whimsical sort and feeling a little bit of career burn-out himself, is up to the challenge and grants Nolan all of his mighty powers. What Nolan comes to realize throughout the film is that being High and Mighty has its consequences like his floundering relationship with his girlfriend, Grace, as played by Jennifer Anniston. Bruce might have God's powers but it takes him a while to start acting like him.

The Scorecard. Both films are set in Buffalo to give their stories that "could happen to anybody" feeling. Honestly, both of these films have enough plot holes in them you could float an Ark through them. In "Evan Almighty," for example, Carell's Evan needs to build a Ark for two of every animal on Earth, like the Bible says, as a way re-populate. So why does the Ark only travel from Prestige Ridge in Virginia to Washington D.C? Why did these animals appear from nowhere to be transported only a miles away? Wouldn't they still happily exist in other parts of the world and not needed to be saved? Questions...

In "Bruce Almighty," Bruce's godly powers are only applied in his hometown of Buffalo and we never see him dealing with the universally big problems to which would be expected on a global scale. Instead, Bruce deals with his dog peeing in his apartment and traffic jams on his way to work.

Both Bruce and Evan probably need to be taught a lesson by somebody, if not God, but the results are uneven. Bruce is clearly the more selfish, cursing at God because, shock!, he can't be a TV anchorman. Oh, boo-hoo! But Jim Carrey did a better job bringing the comedy out of Bruce. Evan, in contrast, is more the beset guy being screwed with by God. We've even seen the complications before -- when his facial hair is growing uncontrollably, I'm thinking "Santa Claus."

The one consistently wonderful element of both films is, of course, Morgan Freeman who is just detached and bemused enough to be warm and funny at the same time. I'm not sure about the theology of God appearing in a white suit and spending time with TV personalities and politicians when there are so many more deserving types out there, but that's the movies, I guess.

Anyway, this is clearly one of those choices where the films are not so great that you simply have to see both of them. Both are humorous films with comically perfect leads, but both require a lot of faith of its viewers to believe in the powers of the almighty.If you have to pick one, here's my recommendation:

The Decision. The sequel -- despite having more money than God (been saving that one!) thrown at it -- is simply not as good as the Original Creation. "Bruce Almighty" is hardly perfect but, if you haven't seen either it or "Evan Almighty," my advice is to go for the rental now and see how you feel later. Even in its worst moments, "Bruce Almighty" still manages to tip-toe up to the point of creating an atmosphere where one can forgot about the limits of being human and focus on the limitlessness of being God. "Evan Almighty" is just the story about the ultimate hassle.