Evan Almighty (2007) -vs- Bruce Almighty (2003)
Review by Lauren Zabel
The Smackdown. People like to talk about having a "personal" relationship with God. Maybe that's why both these films bring in audiences -- the chance to watch the main characters actually have that relationship on screen in a literal sense. In the wish-fulfillment saga of "Bruce Almighty," weatherman Bruce goes into an on-air meltdown followed by a rant to God about how he's doing a miserable job. Now, in the sequel "Evan Almighty," Evan prays to the Man Upstairs for good luck on his first day as a congressman -- and does it as if it's just another quick cell-phone call. Both Bruce and Evan end up in a one-on-one with God, but it's an open question as to whether this Divine Intervention was enough to float either film. You've probably heard already that "Evan Almighty" had the highest budget for a comedy in film history. Money well-spent? We'll see...

"Listen, God, do you mind if I call you that? Anyway, the thing is when I said I liked animals, I was thinking more along the lines of getting a dog."
The Challenger. "Evan Almighty" is the newest movie from the creative team of director Tom Shadyac and writer Steve Oedekerk, who collaborated together on "Bruce Almighty." Evan Baxter, as played by Steve Carell, a Buffalo news anchor (he was in the original) turned Congressman, moves his family to Washington, D.C. for his new career in politics. Evan got elected through his campaign promise of 'Change the World,' which seems like one tall order for Evan to fill. Even though Evan doesn't even have a new iPhone, God still answers his call. Connection made, though, God personally assigns him the biblical duty of building an Ark due to an imminent flood. Naturally, Evan would rather tend to the people's business as he defines it rather than Ark building but Morgan Freeman's God is an unusually persuasive constituent. You try saying "no" to the guy.

"You'll get used to the walking-on-water thing and, besides, when you see what I have in store for the next guy, you'll thank me."
The Scorecard. Both films are set in Buffalo to give their stories that "could happen to anybody" feeling. Honestly, both of these films have enough plot holes in them you could float an Ark through them. In "Evan Almighty," for example, Carell's Evan needs to build a Ark for two of every animal on Earth, like the Bible says, as a way re-populate. So why does the Ark only travel from Prestige Ridge in Virginia to Washington D.C? Why did these animals appear from nowhere to be transported only a miles away? Wouldn't they still happily exist in other parts of the world and not needed to be saved? Questions...
In "Bruce Almighty," Bruce's godly powers are only applied in his hometown of Buffalo and we never see him dealing with the universally big problems to which would be expected on a global scale. Instead, Bruce deals with his dog peeing in his apartment and traffic jams on his way to work.
Both Bruce and Evan probably need to be taught a lesson by somebody, if not God, but the results are uneven. Bruce is clearly the more selfish, cursing at God because, shock!, he can't be a TV anchorman. Oh, boo-hoo! But Jim Carrey did a better job bringing the comedy out of Bruce. Evan, in contrast, is more the beset guy being screwed with by God. We've even seen the complications before -- when his facial hair is growing uncontrollably, I'm thinking "Santa Claus."
The one consistently wonderful element of both films is, of course, Morgan Freeman who is just detached and bemused enough to be warm and funny at the same time. I'm not sure about the theology of God appearing in a white suit and spending time with TV personalities and politicians when there are so many more deserving types out there, but that's the movies, I guess.
Anyway, this is clearly one of those choices where the films are not so great that you simply have to see both of them. If you have to pick one, here's my recommendation:
Both are humorous films with comically perfect leads, but both require a lot of faith of its viewers to believe in the powers of the almighty.
The Decision. The sequel -- despite having more money than God (been saving that one!) thrown at it -- is simply not as good as the Original Creation. "Bruce Almighty" is hardly perfect but, if you haven't seen either it or "Evan Almighty," my advice is to go for the rental now and see how you feel later. Even in its worst moments, "Bruce Almighty" still manages to tip-toe up to the point of creating an
atmosphere where one can forgot about the limits of being human and
focus on the limitlessness of being God. "Evan Almighty" is just the story about the ultimate hassle.



If there's only one comedy scene that made me wet my pants with hysterical laughter, it's the moment when Bruce induces Evan to go utterly Looney Tunes while trying to read the news: it's the moment Steve Carell became a household name, and remains, to date, the single funniest scene in any film I have ever seen.
Evan Almighty, while trying hard, just didn't match the original. Even WITH Steve Carell as the lead actor.
Posted by: Rodney | December 01, 2008 at 06:11 PM
hayevery one
Posted by: About | October 09, 2008 at 02:47 AM
Never to be taken in a serious theological or even moral context, Bruce Almighty did have something to say though: we tend to criticize that which we can't understand. Some food for thought while I was having a couple of good laughs.
Evan... well, no respect given, no respect returned. Cheap shots and cheap laughs, that's all I can say.
Posted by: CubOfJudahsLion | July 11, 2007 at 04:07 PM
And, frankly, neither one of these movies was quite as good as "Oh, God" from 1977. George Burns as God, now that's casting!
Posted by: Bryce Zabel | July 02, 2007 at 08:47 PM