The Smackdown | Both of our films have to do with unrequited time travel. In other words, there are two time frames in each movie and they impact each other, but the characters can't actually get together. On the other hand, people in the past can plant trees or leave clues for the people in the future. They're both mind-benders, but so is the New York Times crossword puzzle, and you don't pay $10 to solve it.
The Challenger |"The Lake House" supposes that two people can fall in love while occupying the same house, albeit two years apart (2004 and 2006).
"This photo will make people think we're actually in the movie together. I feel so guilty."
The Defending Champion |"Frequency" allows a man in 1999 to talk to his father in 1969 for a little dad-son bonding, and while they're at it, they get caught up in tracking down a serial killer.
"If the guy on the shortwave is my son and he's the same age as me now... man, I need a drink."
The Scorecard |Neither of these movies can stand up to the test of logic. It's not because the screenwriters didn't try but because both require solutions that make time a Mobius strip that continues to turn in on itself. The only way to enjoy either one is to admit to yourself early on that it probably isn't making air-tight sense, then give in to the cinematic ride. Otherwise, you'll be frustrated.
The Decision |"The Lake House" is a romantic drama about finding true love and will work best for women. "Frequency" is a dramatic thriller about fathers and sons and will work best for men. You will love what you love depending on your sex but, for me, I have to vote with my fellow males and declare for "Frequency." It's also, in my opinion, the better movie because it's got more pace, more story and more punch.
Recent Comments